App Store Rejection: 12 Common Reasons & Fixes

Getting rejected by Apple after weeks of development is deeply frustrating. The good news: nearly all app store rejection reasons are predictable, fixable, and fully avoidable once you know the patterns. We’ve shipped 12+ apps and seen the same issues surface repeatedly. Here are the twelve culprits we encounter most, plus the fix for each.

Why Apple rejects apps (the short version)

Apple reviews every build against its App Store Review Guidelines, covering safety, performance, business, design, and legal categories. Reviewers check real devices, so a crash or missing privacy disclosure is hard to miss.

Most rejections land in a handful of categories — meaning a targeted pre-submission checklist catches the majority before they reach a reviewer.

The 12 most common app store rejection reasons

1. Crashes and poor performance

Apple tests on real hardware. If the app crashes on launch, freezes for more than a few seconds, or fails a basic user flow, it is rejected outright. This is consistently the number-one reason — and it is always avoidable.

Fix: Test on the oldest device and iOS version you claim to support. Run TestFlight for at least a week before submitting. Use Xcode Organizer crash reports during beta to close every crash before submission.

2. Broken or placeholder content

Submissions with “Lorem ipsum” placeholder text, empty screens, disabled buttons, or demo accounts that don’t work will be rejected for incomplete functionality.

Fix: Walk through every flow as a first-time user before uploading. Make sure any required login credentials are included in the reviewer notes — Apple will reject an app it simply cannot access.

3. Missing or incomplete privacy disclosures

Apple requires a Privacy Policy URL for almost every app, and it has to actually exist and be accessible. Beyond that, if your app accesses the camera, microphone, location, contacts, or any other sensitive data, the Info.plist must contain the corresponding NSUsageDescription key with a plain-English explanation.

Fix: Add a NSCameraUsageDescription, NSLocationWhenInUseUsageDescription, or whichever keys apply. Host a real privacy policy and paste the URL into App Store Connect. Incomplete privacy strings are an instant rejection.

4. Guideline 3.1 — in-app purchase bypass

If your app sells digital goods or unlocks features, those purchases must go through Apple’s IAP system. Linking to an external website to complete a digital purchase — or even mentioning that a cheaper price exists elsewhere — violates Guideline 3.1 and triggers rejection.

Fix: Route all digital content purchases through StoreKit. Physical goods and services (e.g., ride-hailing, food delivery) are exempt. If you offer a web subscription tier, you may not promote it inside the app.

5. Misleading metadata or screenshots

App name, subtitle, keywords, description, and screenshots must accurately represent what the app does. Keyword stuffing competitors’ brand names, claiming features the app doesn’t have, or using screenshots from a different app are all grounds for rejection.

Fix: Align screenshots with the current build exactly. Keep keywords relevant to your actual category. Apple’s reviewers check the description against the live experience.

6. Insufficient user value or “thin” content

Apps that are little more than a web view wrapping a mobile-responsive website, or that provide no functionality beyond what a browser already offers, are rejected for not meeting the minimum bar for an app.

Fix: Deliver a native experience — push notifications, offline access, device sensors, or deeply integrated UI. If your product is primarily a website, invest in making the app feel meaningfully different.

Tip: A common trap is wrapping a WordPress site in a WKWebView and calling it an app. Apple has seen this pattern thousands of times and rejects it consistently. Native screens, even a few of them, change the calculus entirely.

If your app supports any third-party social login (Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.), Apple requires you to also offer Sign in with Apple as an option. Skipping it is an automatic rejection.

Fix: Implement Sign in with Apple via AuthenticationServices. It takes a day to integrate and is now a non-negotiable checkbox for any app with social auth.

8. Unsafe or inappropriate user-generated content

Apps that allow users to post content must have a moderation system, a way for users to flag or report content, and a mechanism for the developer to take down offending material. Without these, the app fails the safety review.

Fix: Build a reporting flow before launch. Document your moderation process in the reviewer notes. Age-gate content categories where appropriate.

9. Inaccurate category or rating

Selecting the wrong primary category to chase chart rankings, or under-rating mature content to reach a wider audience, results in rejection or removal after launch.

Fix: Be honest. If your app has mature themes, select the appropriate age rating. Category placement should reflect the core purpose.

10. Location access without a clear purpose

Apps that request “Always On” location access but only actually need “When In Use” access are rejected. Apple reviewers physically test whether background location is necessary.

Fix: Request the minimum location permission your feature genuinely needs. Justify background location in the reviewer notes with a concrete use case if you need it.

11. Third-party SDK policy violations

If a third-party analytics, advertising, or attribution SDK in your app accesses the IDFA or user data without proper disclosure, Apple can reject the build even if your own code is clean. The SDK’s violations become yours.

Fix: Audit every SDK you include. Check the SDK vendor’s App Store compliance documentation. If a library hasn’t been updated for App Tracking Transparency, replace it before submission.

12. Guideline 4.3 — spam and copycat apps

Submitting multiple apps that are nearly identical, cloning a competitor’s app without adding genuine value, or flooding the store with template variations all trigger Guideline 4.3 rejections. Apple is particularly aggressive here if the same developer account shows a pattern.

Fix: Build something meaningfully differentiated. If you need a white-label strategy with multiple apps, each must have a distinct audience, content set, or feature set that a reviewer can identify on the spot.

Comparison: rejection category by severity

Reason	Guideline	Can fix in hours?	Risk of account action?
Crash on launch	2.1	Yes (if root cause is known)	Low
IAP bypass	3.1	No — requires architecture change	Medium
Missing privacy strings	5.1	Yes	Low
No Sign in with Apple	4.8	Yes (1 day)	Low
Spam / copycat	4.3	No	High
Misleading metadata	2.3	Yes	Medium

Before you submit: a quick pre-flight checklist

Tested on oldest supported device and iOS version
All NSUsageDescription keys populated in Info.plist
Privacy Policy URL live and pasted into App Store Connect
Sign in with Apple present (if any social login exists)
All purchases routed through StoreKit
Screenshots match the current build exactly
Reviewer notes explain any login credentials or unusual flows
All third-party SDKs are ATT-compliant

How we approach App Store submissions

Every app we ship goes through a structured pre-submission audit before the binary touches App Store Connect. A two-hour checklist at the end of a build consistently saves a week of reviewer back-and-forth.

If you want to avoid these pitfalls from the start, see how we work and the apps we’ve shipped. Getting compliance right early is far cheaper than retrofitting after a rejection.

Ready to build something that ships clean? Tell us about your project and we’ll map out a path that keeps reviewers happy from day one.

Building something like this?

Fera Tech ships iOS & full-stack apps end-to-end. Tell us about your project.

Start a project